Contact Lenses Grading Scales. Etiology. Normal grade. Comment. Bulbar redness. Dilation of bulbar vessels, e.g. due to mechanical stimulation. CCLRU O GRADING SCALES. CCLRU. SCCLRU. BULBAR REDNESS. SLIGHT. 2. SLIGHT. 3. MODERATE. SEVERE. OCCLRU. LIMBAL. Eye care professionals: See the Efron Grading Scales for a standard clinical reference for describing the severity of 16 contact lens complications.

Author: Midal Fenris
Country: Kuwait
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 1 April 2016
Pages: 448
PDF File Size: 4.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.71 Mb
ISBN: 317-5-31388-992-3
Downloads: 43788
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikonris

A new scale assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae. Both clinical grading scales have been published in prominent textbooks and widely distributed around the world, free of charge, by several major contact lens companies.

Individually, our grading is repeatable, so we should continue to use the scales in the way we are doing now. Clinical grading scales Closing Date: There has been much discussion and debate in the literature concerning the merits and relative difficulties of constructing photographic versus pictorial grading scales, with the suggestion that painted grading scales, although not gradingg realistic as photographs, allow more control in depicting incremental increases in severity that are clear and unambiguous to the clinician.

Social media and SEO success Seven ways: This duplicitous practice represents a conservative approach to record keeping and suggests that many practitioners consider the recording of clinical grades and clinical photography to be complementary approaches. Lies, statistics, and clinical significance. Wolffsohn JSPurslow C. Slit lamp classification system.


C42682: Clinical grading scales

However, there is a limit to such interpolation; 0. Int J Microcirculation Clin Exp ; 6: Curr Eye Res ; In order to improve and standardise anterior eye evaluations between practitioners, subjective grading scales were first popularised back in the mids. Staining can differ scles intensity dependent on factors such as the amount of fluorescein instilled, tear film production and drainage, depth of the woundarea, shape, and segmentation.

Int Contact Lens Clinics ; To use previously validated image analysis techniques to determine the incremental nature of printed subjective anterior eye grading scales.

Validated image analysis sxales of edge detection and colour extraction showed that bulbar hyperaemia, palpebral hyperaemia roughness, and corneal staining grade images were quadratic rather than linear in nature.

Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis

Edge detection and colour extraction image analysis techniques are highly repeatable and offer the potential for more repeatable and sensitive grading than using printed subjective grading scales. Such scales vary in the number of images and conditions of interest and can be descriptive, 1, 2 artistically rendered, 3 photographic, 4— 6 or computer generated.

Accepted Mar The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales. A general increase in edges detected with increasing scale grade was seen in the all the scales analysed, although the change in green colouration was more variable.


Support Center Support Center. The response rate was 31 per cent.

The average time taken to record anterior eye health was 6. Automated measurement of bulbar redness. Practitioners must record the grading scale used, and ideally standardise this within an individual practice or corporate groups. This may involve the use of movie sequence of images, a CD for the Efron gratings, a phone app, or computer software programs. Increments of scales used.

Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non-contact lens wearers.

EFRON-CCLRU GRADING SCALES for (Android) Free Download on MoboMarket

National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Am J Ophthalmol ; Journal List Br J Ophthalmol v. What we are not that good at, however, is being consistent with our colleagues. Image analysis techniques are 6—35 times more repeatable than subjective grading, with a sensitivity of 1. Editor’s choice Look local: Grading conjunctival hyperaemia using a photography-based method.

The printed grading scales were more sensitive for grading features of low severity, but grades were not comparable between grading scales. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

A novel grading method for superficial punctate keratopathy magnitude and its correlation with corneal epithelial permeability.