QR code for Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Title, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Author, John Heritage. Publisher, Gaudeamus, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. John Heritage ; [suomentajat: Ilkka Arminen et al.] Gaudeamus, c Other Title. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Harold Garfinkel, etnometodologia e o esporte coletivo. Public. · Hosted by Blog do Sociofilo. Interested. clock. Thursday, October 13, at PM –
|Published (Last):||14 November 2013|
|PDF File Size:||14.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In as much as the study of social orders is “inexorably intertwined” with the constitutive features of talk about those social orders, ethnomethodology is committed to an interest in both conversational talk, and the role this talk plays in the constitution of that order.
A reader’s guide to ethnomethodology”. Ethnomethodology has perplexed commentators, due to its radical approach to questions of theory and method. Ethnomethodology provides methods which have been used in ethnographic studies to produce accounts of people’s methods for negotiating everyday situations.
Even though ethnomethodology has been characterised as having a “phenomenological sensibility”,  and reliable commentators have acknowledged that “there is a strong influence of phenomenology on ethnomethodology The approach was originally developed by Harold Garfinkelwho attributed its origin to his work investigating the conduct of jury members in With regard to theory, Garfinkel has consistently advocated an attitude of ethnomethodological indifference, a principled agnosticism with regard to social theory which insists that the shared understandings of members of a social setting under study take precedence over any concepts which a social theorist might bring to the analysis from outside that setting.
The relationship between ethnomethodology and conversation analysis has been contentious at times, given their overlapping interests, the close collaboration between their founders and the subsequent divergence of interest among many practitioners. The confusion between the two disciplines stems, in part, from the practices of some ethnomethodologists including Garfinkelwho sift through phenomenological texts, recovering phenomenological concepts and findings relevant to their interests, and then transpose these concepts and findings to topics in the study of social order.
Garfinkel speaks of phenomenological texts and findings as being “appropriated” and intentionally “misread” for the purposes of exploring topics in the study of social order.
GARFINKEL: HAROLD LA ETNOMETODOLOGIA | Flor mdcr –
According to George Psathasfive types of ethnomethodological study can be identified Psathas Since ethnomethodology has become anathema to certain sociologists, and since those practicing it like to perceive their own efforts as constituting a radical break from prior sociologies, there has been little attempt to link ethnomethodology to these prior sociologies. Ethnomethodology, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 15— Even though barold is not a form of phenomenology, the reading and understanding of phenomenological texts, and developing the capability of seeing phenomenologically is essential to the actual doing of ethnomethodological studies.
In other projects Wikibooks. Views Read Edit View history. Similarly, ethnomethodology advocates no formal methods of enquiry, harild that the research method be dictated by the nature of the phenomenon that is being studied. etnometodologix
Harold Garfinkel S 1967
On the other hand, where the study of conversational talk is divorced from its situated context—that is, when it takes on the character of a purely technical method and “formal analytic” enterprise in its own right—it is not a form of ethnomethodology.
For the ethnomethodologist, participants produce the order of social settings through their shared sense making practices. For the ethnomethodologist, the methodic realisation of social scenes takes place within the actual setting under scrutiny, and is structured by the participants in that setting through the reflexive accounting of that setting’s features.
This section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. On the other hand, the authors and theoretical references cited by Garfinkel do not constitute a rigorous theoretical basis for ethnomethodology. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This page was last edited on 30 Octoberat Anderson The ethnomethodologists. Sociological theories Science and technology studies Methods in sociology. Thus, there is etnometodplogia essential natural reflexity between the activity of making sense of a social setting and the ongoing production of that setting; the two are in effect identical. Instead, these borrowings are only fragmentary references to theoretical works from which ethnomethodology has appropriated theoretical ideas for the expressed purposes of doing ethnomethodological investigations.
June Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: In contrast to traditional sociological forms of inquiry, it is a hallmark of the ethnomethodological perspective that it does not make theoretical or methodological appeals to: Kurt WolfTransaction Publishers, The focus of the investigation used in our example is the social order of surfing, the ethnomethodological interest is in the “how” the methods and practices of the production and maintenance of this social order. Using an appropriate Southern California example: Lastly, there is no claim in any of Garfinkel’s work that ethnomethodology is a form of phenomenology, or phenomenological sociology.
As Garfinkel states in regard to the work of the phenomenologist Aron Gurwitsch, especially his “Field of Consciousness” Ethnomethodology is not Durkheimian, although it shares some of the interests of Durkheim; it is not phenomenology, although it borrows from Husserl and Schutz’s studies of the lifeworld Lebenswelt ; it is not a form of Gestalt theory, although it describes social orders as having Gestalt-like properties; and, it is not Wittgensteinian, although it makes use of Wittgenstein’s understanding of rule-use, etc.
When such analytical concepts are generated from within one setting and conceptually applied generalised to another, the re application represents a violation of the strong form of the unique adequacy requirement of methods. This interest developed out of Garfinkel’s critique of Talcott Parsons ‘ attempt to derive a general theory of society.
This critique originated in his reading of Alfred Schutzthough Garfinkel ultimately revised many of Schutz’s ideas. In essence the distinctive difference between sociological approaches and ethnomethodology is that the latter adopts a commonsense attitude towards knowledge.
Such interpretive transpositions do not make the ethnomethodologist a phenomenologist, or ethnomethodology a form of phenomenology. In essence ethnomethodology attempts to create classifications of the social actions of individuals within groups through drawing on the experience of the groups directly, without imposing on the setting the opinions of the researcher with regards to social order, as is the case with sociological studies.
The discovery of society. Talk is seen as indexical and embedded in a specific social order. Articles that may contain original research from June All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers. The job of the Ethnomethodologist is to describe the methodic character of these activities, not account for them in a way that transcends that which is made available in and through the actual accounting practices of the individual’s party to those settings.